QA Automation: advanced test automation for software quality

starstarstarstarstar 0 rates
QA Automation applies engineering practices to software testing for repeatable checks and transparent metrics. Intended for learners with a Java baseline.
QA Automation — test automation and quality assurance
Partner:
Partner courses:
Difficulty:
Medium
Format of the event:
Virtual classrooms
Certificate:
Yes
Price
8475 hrn.
Ask a question
Add to collection
you haven't created a collection yet
Add Collection
+

Course overview

Description generated based on course syllabus and open data.

QA Automation is the engineering-driven approach to verifying software where tests are executed by automation tools. The goal is reproducible checks, clear metrics, and timely defect detection.

The material is intended for learners with basic Java; absolute beginners in programming may need extra time to learn syntax and tooling.

Who QA Automation suits and who it does not

Good fit for test automation

  • Manual QA professionals aiming to scale verification through automation.
  • Entry-level developers with Java who want deeper quality assurance skills.
  • Analysts and technical specialists needing reproducible regression tests and quality metrics.
  • Teams integrating tests into CI/CD to reduce repetitive manual work.

Not an ideal fit for QA automation

  • Those avoiding programming and tool configuration.
  • Those expecting instant outcomes without practice and failure analysis.
  • Cases where a highly volatile UI makes automation costlier than manual checks.

Problem → outcome in QA Automation

  • Problem: Regression consumes significant time and human effort. → Outcome: Critical scenarios are automated; runtime decreases via parallelization.
  • Problem: Flaky tests and false failures. → Outcome: Page Object, proper waits, and retries reduce instability.
  • Problem: Hard-to-reproduce defects. → Outcome: Logs, screenshots, videos, and artifacts captured automatically; defects are documented reproducibly.
  • Problem: Fragmented quality metrics. → Outcome: Reports and dashboards (e.g., Allure) summarize coverage and test stability.

Comparison with alternatives in software testing

Manual QA as an alternative to QA Automation

Suitable for exploratory, one-off, and highly visual checks. Limitation — scalability and repeatability for large regressions.

Self-learning test automation

Flexible but requires a plan, reviews, and project practice. Risk — gaps in patterns, CI/CD, and reporting.

Formal CS education without QA automation practice

Provides theory and algorithmic background, yet often lacks applied frameworks, test stability techniques, and pipeline integration.

Outcomes after completing a QA Automation program

  • Environment setup: dependency managers, project structure, local and CI execution.
  • UI/API automation using frameworks and patterns (Page Object, data-driven, retries, waits).
  • Quality assurance practices: test design, equivalence classes, boundary values, regression prioritization.
  • Artifact collection and reporting: logs, screenshots, dashboards, integration with defect trackers.
  • Basic CI/CD integration: triggers, parallel runs, test tagging.
  • Portfolio with an automation repository and its documentation.

Course Description

Evaluation

Only authorized users can leave reviews and rate
Log in »

Recommended Courses


Manual QA + AI

improveme


21 688 hrn.
0 Reviews
Improveme.Tech
Terms of use
Privacy Policy
© 2022-2026 Improveme.Tech
With the support of the web studio "Site Made in Odessa"
×
×